According to a new study, researchers have found that people who troll online often have nasty personalities. And, well, they like doing it. Trolls enjoy trolling.
Surprised? Not sure anyone would be.
Nonetheless, the researchers found that trolls scored highly on a number of personality traits examined: Machiavellianism, psychopathy, narcissism, extraversion, disagreeableness and sadism.
Trolling is, according to the researchers (Buckels et al., 2014), the “practice of behaving in a deceptive, destructive, or disruptive manner in a social setting on the Internet with no apparent instrumental purpose.” People who troll like to post comments to websites or communities online that cause trouble, insult others, and cause general mayhem, just for the sheer pleasure of seeing what happens when they do so.
The researchers coined their own term for four of the personality variables they studied, which they call the Dark Tetrad of personality: Machiavellianism, psychopathy, narcissism, and sadism. Machiavellianism is a willingness to manipulate and deceive others, while psychopathy is not having any remorse or empathy for others. The researchers thought everyday sadism would be most conducive to trolling behavior online.
In two studies of over 1,215 participants, the researchers found that a number of personality traits were associated with a greater likelihood for trolling.
In the first study of 418 Mechanical Turk workers, the researchers found 5.6 percent of survey respondents enjoyed trolling. They scored significantly higher on traits of Machiavellianism, psychopathy, narcissism, extraversion and sadism. They also scored lower on agreeableness (meaning they were, from a personality standpoint, more disagreeable).
In the second study, the researchers found that both sadism and Machiavellianism were the best predictors of enjoyment of trolling behavior online.
Most of those participants came from the Amazon Mechanical Turk service, where participants were paid $0.50 for their participation in taking all of the surveys the researchers administered. ((Mechanical Turk workers are not really representative of the American population as a whole (PDF), but that’s probably not relevant to the current study.))
In the final analysis of Study 2, we found clear evidence that sadists tend to troll because they enjoy it. When controlling for enjoyment, sadism’s impact on trolling was cut nearly in half; and the indirect effect of sadism through enjoyment was substantial, [and] significant […].
Problems with the study? Strangely, the researchers mentioned no limitations of their study. Other than the use of their own measures (which were listed as “in press” in the study), the researchers apparently never defined “trolling” to the participants in the study. It could mean different things to different people. And of course, the participants were either largely Mechanical Turk workers or Canadian college students. These results may not generalize to the population.
It’s good to know that trolls online have a personality type that fits with what most of us view them as being — sadistic, deceptive and in it for themselves. Trolls just want to have fun? Sure… but who doesn’t?
Reference
Buckelsa, EE, Trapnellb, PD, Paulhusc, DL (2014). Trolls just want to have fun. Personality and Individual Differences. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.01.016
11 comments
Even worse than Trolls…Barnacles!
“defn: A Barnacle is a person who haunts Usenet Newsgroups, Bulletin Boards and Fora. They offer a narrow interpretation of the purpose of the board, sometimes bordering on the absurd, or due to their own misinterpretation of the original charter. They make their living by calling almost anyone who disagrees with, or offers dissenting opinions a “troll” (which is grammatically incorrect because troll is a verb, not a noun…as in, to troll for shrimp).”
http://you-read-it-here-first.com/viewtopic.php?t=559&sid=4c9ff40e32d6d956b6f2c0305f03f54c
Toby Machelson, what are you on about…barnacles? well what would you know? do you actually own a barn? I didn’t think so, leave acles out of this moron.
Probably aclephobic.
I troll on sites of people who put up footage of themselves boastfully being cruel to animals.
These people are not very bright and I am no psychologist but I think they have psychopathic personality disorders so I have to lower my language to their level in order to communicate with them.
If my trolling brings some very small resistance to their cruelty and speaks out for those that cannot defend themselves, than I am glad to be a troll.
What about “joker” type trolls? Who’s main goal is deceiving gullible people with sarcasm and humor, or testing people’s stupidity? Sort of like “The Onion” fake news?
Is this even considered trolling?
Operating with such a wide definition of “trolling” is completely unhelpful, and to call it inherently without “instrumental purpose” shows a clear lack of knowledge and/or perspective on the issue.
So much of what would be deemed “trolling” by this study and the article about it is done with the intent of skewering perceived stupidity and making a larger point outside of the context of the discussion(s) in question; even trolling intended solely for cynical personal gain cannot be said to be contrived without deliberate goals in mind, although some of the same personality states would likely still apply.
If we aren’t going to subjectively assign “troll” status to things on an arbitrary basis derived from each individual’s subjective preferences (which cannot ever truly be considered prescriptive for others), it would be wise to try and remove the assumption of maliciousness (both in purpose and motivation) from analysis of it as an activity and/or strategy.
In the future, please try to divorce personal insecurities about having seen social media posts with what you consider an ugly or belligerent tone with the overall concept of using the internet to provoke reactions in other individuals and groups, as the latter is obviously capable of being located at any point on an ethical spectrum and should not be portrayed as negative by default.
ðŸ‘ðŸ‘👊
9/11 was inside job
What is the difference between Judaism and zionism?
This article is looking at only one subset of trolling. The analysis reminds me of a grandma explaining why the young kids on her street like rap music. There are lots of varieties of trolls. I don’t mind admitting I enjoy it. Trolls typically reveal the hypocrisy or illogic being used in an argument. Trolls question things most people just accept on faith. Those who dislike trolling typically don’t like the fact that their “educated” argument has just been picked apart by a kid in high school.
I love trolling people. Love to see the idiots gets so worked up over trivial matters. Great to see the hateful replies. Guess I’m a sick f_c_k.