Tomorrow will mark the release of the first public draft of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition — also known as the DSM-V. (As you can see, we have an exclusive first-copy of it to the right!)
Because we were not on the American Psychiatric Association’s media list, we didn’t receive a copy of the news releases that the mainstream media will be basing a lot of their stories around that will be published tomorrow. We also weren’t invited to the conference call today, despite our repeated attempts to contact the APA’s media office.
This turns out to be good news for our readers. I’m free to talk about what I suspect will be in the draft that appears on the dsmv.org website tomorrow. I gathered this information from numerous anonymous sources, both online and off. Here’s what you’re likely to find in tomorrow’s draft release of the DSM V:
Autism Spectrum Disorders
As we first noted back in November, Asperger’s Syndrome is slated for the chopping block in the DSM-V. Instead, all the autism-related disorders — including Asperger’s — will be placed into a general category known as Autism Spectrum Disorders. Asperger’s will probably be known as something similar to “mild autism” in this new category in the DSM-V.
Behavioral Addictions
Yes, you heard me right — behavioral addictions as a category has made it into the draft revision (according to our sources). The only behavioral addiction that will be recognized, however, will be pathological gambling. Sex addiction and Internet addiction (which, remember, started off as a joke in 1995) will instead appear in the Appendix under the Criteria Sets and Axes Provided for Further Study. In other words, the concept of a “behavioral addiction” will be recognized, but most specific behavioral addictions simply do not have the robust research base to be included at this time. So while technically in the DSM V, Internet addiction and sex addiction are not disorders that can be diagnosed at this time (by providing an agreed-upon set of criteria, the DSM V publishers hope researchers can use the criteria to further research in those areas).
Substance & Alcohol Dependence Gone
For a long time now, the DSM-IV has made the distinction between someone who was “abusing” alcohol or illegal substances like cocaine, and those who were “dependent” upon them. It was a difference with very little distinction or use amongst clinicians, since substance abuse and alcohol abuse treatment were largely the same no matter which of the two diagnoses you received. DSM-V will rectify this confusing two sets of diagnoses and combine them into one that will have a set of specifiers to note severity and length.
Binge Eating Disorder
Languishing in the categories needing further research for 16 years, binge eating disorder will now be a recognized eating disorder in the regular section of the DSM V. This will come as a relief to tens of thousands of people every year who have this concern, but have not had it officially recognized by the American Psychiatric Association until now.
Dimensional Assessments
As we noted way back in May of last year, one of the most significant changes in the DSM-V draft will be the inclusion of dimensional assessments for depression, anxiety, cognitive impairment and reality distortion that span across most mental disorders. So a clinician might diagnose schizophrenia, but then also rate these four dimensions for the patient to characterize the schizophrenia in a more detailed and descriptive manner. We’re not certain how well these catch on with clinicians unless they become required by insurance companies, as past efforts to supplement diagnoses with additional patient functional information have been failures.
Assessing Risk
Prodromal signs is a fancy psychobabble term for assessing risk and looking for the signs of a disorder before it turns into a full-blown disorder. Imagine if we could more reliably and consistently assess risk for depression, actually preventing some people from becoming full-blown depressed? I’m not certain exactly how this is showing up in the draft, but there will be more of an emphasis in the DSM V draft in assessing risk.
Temper Dysregulation in Children
High emotional reactivity, high temper, emotional over-reactivity and affective lability. Now there’s a mouthful! What did I just say? The interpretation of this new proposed disorder for the DSM-V is basically for children who can’t control their temper (you probably know someone like this in your life), and because of the way their anger spills out into their lives, they suffer from depression. It will be characterized by persistent negative mood with bursts of rage. So this new disorder will be known as “Temper Dysregulation with dysphoria,” or something like that, in the DSM V.
So there you have it — a quick rundown of the highlights that you’ll see in the draft public release of the DSM-V tomorrow. We’ll have a more in-depth run-down tomorrow about the biggest changes.
22 comments
Thanks for the post, I’m sure a lot of people are interested in what they put out tomorrow.
Any news about complex PTSD?
“Temper Dysregulation with dysphoria”? Is that abbreviated “PMS” or “teenager”?
The APA clearly doesn’t understand Health 2.0, e-patients, the power of social media. Why can’t these people get it? Of friggin course you should be on the media list. For Pete’s sake!
Thanks John as always for useful information!
http://www.dsm5.org/Pages/Default.aspx is a link to proposed changes, with ability to comment. I haven’t looked through these, but judging from trends, Americans (of which I am one) continually devise new “disorders” while people in other countries are more accepting of differences from the hypothetical “norm.” On the other hand, an official “diagnosis” enables individuals in the U.S. to access educational and mental health services that they might otherwise be excluded from. DSM-V, like its predecessors, will thus reflect both a research-based compendium and a point in time in mental health “treatment culture” and societal cultural evolution.
“Temper Dysregulation with dysphoia, Please enough of giving our teens excuses to abuse any person with/without authority just because things are not “Their” way. How about Temper Dysregulation R/T inability of parents to parent as evidence by dysphoia for not getting their own way or to justify medicating behavior as evidenced by no consequences.
As an OT who works with children with sensory issues, I was hoping to see something about Sensory Processing Disorder (SPD). I’m still crossing my fingers!
I agree. I too was hoping that SPD would be recognized. My son is unable to attend a public school because of his sensory issues and the school doesn’t have OTs that are familiar with his needs.
Sounds promising! Thanks for the article.
How about calling a brain injury “brain injury” instead of as organic affective disorder. A broken bone isn’t a disorder, a damaged brain shouldn’t be either.
What about disciplining a child when THEY don’t get their way, all the time!
Now we have diagnosis for hypersensitivity, deficit disorder, Asperger’s, and a slew of SYNDOMES that are made to fit our growing children.
Can we slack up on the syndomes and raise kids for potential and not give in to their whims and fits!
Many of the comments being made here have good points. It would be useful, too, to remember that some people with temper problems want to control their tempers and cannot consistently do so–they are not all spoiled or poorly parented. Some have this problem due to brain injury–oftentimes from exposure to large amounts of alcohol while in the womb (FASD). The key is to not over diagnose any condition.
How do the task force/ decision makers, decide the criteria for diagnosis and epidemiology/incidence rates for ‘Post traumatic stress disorder’, when we notice in society most of the diagnosis among military veterans, FAKE. Almost all of these ‘patients’ (some are boxers) have secondary gains, such as financial benefits. Is there any study done for PTSD among civilian populations, where there is any secondary gains motive, unlikely?
Thanks John,
just wanted to let you know the link to dsmv.org is broken…
Thanks for the report, John.
I find it absurd that only gambling can be qualified as
a behavioral addiction, and that “internet addiction and
sex addiction are not disorders that can be diagnosed at
this time.”
The research on sex addiction is more than ample to
qualify it as an addiction in the DSM V. The research
data includes brain mapping of sex addicts and recovered
sex addicts, which match the chemical addiction studies.
For those interested, check http://www.sexintegrate.com,
and click on “What is a sex addict.”
Hi Dr. John~
Found you through a class assignment- link on Blackboard. I especially enjoyed the causal text and verbiage for everyman.
The APA link is w/ a 5 in lieu of v.
http://www.dsm5.org/Pages/Default.aspx
The link was posted incorrectly.
It should be:
http://www.dsm5.org
Comments are closed.