The problem? Mental health problems occur throughout many people’s lives and yet they don’t seek out specific help for them. Instead, they turn to their primary care physician to help relieve associated physical complaints. Don Sapatkin, writing for The Philadelphia Inquirer, has the story:
Mental health traditionally has been considered a specialist level of care, and often requires a referral. Yet huge numbers of people go to their doctor for problems that have a behavioral component: headache, fatigue, even diabetes that is out of control because stress has gotten in the way of refilling a script.
Some have a serious problem but don’t want to see a specialist; more antidepressants are prescribed by primary doctors than by psychiatrists. Others have less significant behavioral issues, such as difficulty getting to sleep, that may not warrant referral to a specialist.
What to do? You aren’t going to easily change the entire population’s behavior by just offering better services (even if they’re online), or less expensive services, or more readily accessible mental health services — people just aren’t that interested.
So if you can’t bring the person to the therapist, why not bring the therapist to the person?
Specifically, schedule a brief counseling visit while the patient is being seen by the doctor for their physical complaints. This helps everyone — the overworked doctor, who isn’t a specialist in mental health problems to begin with; the patient, who needs some specific guidance and an empathetic ear to hear their stress and associated complaints; and the therapist, who often wouldn’t get to see these patients because they would never come to the therapist’s office.
It’s called “behavioral health” to differentiate it from general mental health and emphasize its focus on helping people change problematic behaviors that are impacting their general health. The term is also sometimes seen as less stigmatizing as “mental health” and therefore may be more readily accepted by the patient who would otherwise not talk to a counselor.
How it works is simple: A trained behavioral health specialist (e.g., a therapist with specific training in this type of intervention) gives a brief, 15- to 30-minute intervention while a patient is seeing their primary care physician. The focus of the intervention is to address problem behaviors in the person’s life that may be a contributing factor to their health concerns — such as how to better handle stress, tips and skills-training for overwhelmed parents of a toddler, grappling with a grief reaction due to a traumatic event.
The impact on depression, which has been studied the most, appears to be similar to traditional therapy – but integrated care reaches far more people.
That has ripple effects for the growing population with chronic illnesses, especially in low-income communities.
“If you are depressed, you are not as able to do the things that manage these illnesses: good diet, exercise, taking medication to manage the illness,” said Hyong Un, the Blue Bell-based national medical director for behavioral health at Aetna, whose foundation is aiding the integration at six health centers in Philadelphia.
Entwining services can have a large impact. “If I can do something that’s timely or focused that helps you quit smoking, then I’ve done something more for your health than anybody else can do for you,” said Alexander Blount, director of behavioral science in the family medicine department at the University of Massachusetts Medical School.
Everyone seems to like these interventions but here’s the kicker — most insurance companies don’t pay for them! Therefore you won’t find them in your local doctor’s office anytime soon unless it’s a part of an integrated care delivery system, such as Kaiser Permanente in Northern California, federally funded health centers, and Veterans Affairs medical centers.
We fully support the use of integrative care in primary care physician’s offices and hope that insurance companies will come around in understanding their benefits and ability to reach (and therefore, positively impact) many people’s lives who ordinarily would never receive such interventions.
8 comments
I know this very off-topic, but as one of the top 50 websites of 2008, why is it you have grammatical errors in your blogs? In the sixth paragraph it says, “The focus of the intervention is address problem behaviors in the person’s life…” It just seems a little unprofessional. Sorry, just a side note.
As for the article itself, I think it’s a fantastic idea. A lot of times people will be feeling depressed or anxious, and they will convince themselves it is because of some physical situation. People have no problem of convincing themselves that what they think is what they feel. Having someone there to talk to when they see a doctor would not only help them where they need it, but it would give them a little more comfort about the whole situation of going to a psychologist.
I think it’s a great idea too if used with caution. Me being the cynic I am would wonder how many of these counselors would be “ambulance chasers”? For example if someone comes in complaining of migraines and the counselors response would be “uh oh you are anxious…you need years of therapy to work this out.” I think sometimes a patient would be getting a little more than they bargained for…especially if you could just pop a pill at little cost and little effort. But I do agree it is a great service for people who are too shy or feel humiliated asking for help.
Jack, I see your point, but I don’t see this solution becoming “pill popping†or “ambulance chasing.†Dr. Grohol is right, something needs to be done to help those who don’t/won’t/deny.
I saw my primary care (Internist) yesterday. Last week I received a flier in the mail. It was cute and colorful. I didn’t pay much attention to it. While I was in triage yesterday (pre exam room) I was asked if I received the flier and did I complete the check list and comments and bring it with me. No, I said. I did complete the form will at my appt, but not until my doc was in the room as I had questions about items on the flier. My questions were about the mental health questions on the flier.
The flier was about just what Dr. Grohol is talking about, but not on the level that a behavioral health professional in-clinic would use. I was a tool that the physician’s office was using to connect with their patients in an effort to help patients take responsibility for their physical AND mental health.
Having said all of the above, I don’t see my regional medical group bringing in mental or behavorial health counselors…the cost to hire them would be seen as cost prohibitive. But, something does need to be done. And yes, herein lies the problem…cost to the medical group, as well as cost to the insurance company.
In the paragraph that begins with, “How it works is simple†there is a description of how this would work in a medical clinic setting. It sounds great, and cost is certainly a problem, but how many people who receive this intervention would take it seriously? I only see my Internist maybe quarterly, and this is only because I am diabetic and she needs to check my A1c. So, again I have the question how to convince people to take the advice the counselor provides seriously?
Dr. Grohol said in his article, “more readily accessible mental health services — people just aren’t that interested.†Is it that they are not interested or that they are fearful that a “mental health†stigma will fall upon them simply because they saw the counselor? Between denial and stigma, how can one get people to be “interested?†Is the mother with the problematic child going to take the advice received from the counselor and tell his/her coworkers and/or family about it. Or will she deny she needed the advice to begin with out of fear that she may be seen as a problem mother?
Just go to Philip Dawdy’s latest posting at http://www.furiousseasons.com and read how PCPs and pediatricians are sizeable prescribers for psychotropics like stimulants and antipsychotics.
Like this recommendation the above posting is suggesting will not lead to more of this? When will people figure out that this society is more focused on “biochemical imbalances” and “better living through chemistry” to handle these psychological travails that are presented in somatic care offices. The idea of some type of ‘counseling’ at a PCP’s office has some merit, but the adage “the road to hell is paved with good intentions” is the take home message from this at the end of the day. My interpretation of this, not to be demeaning to you, Dr Grohol, is risking the potential to trivialize and dumb down the role of psychological factors to real and perceived medical matters, and patients are not going to make serious strides to work on solving these problems in the multifaceted way they should be directed to seek.
Come on, am I truly the only one who sees the patient in the PCP’s office at the end of the visit having a script pushed across the desk?
I recently found Einstein’s quote that echoes here so well: insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.
And that is the problem: everyone is a bleepin’ mental health care provider until the problem is so immense, leaving the true experienced provider and complicated patient to be showered by the crap hitting the fan!
Sorry I am again not supportive of one of your posts, but I am a voice of dissent until proven otherwise. I will not be silent after enduring many years of alleged good intentions ignoring the realities of setting limits with those who oversimplify the interventions. This line of reasoning will only take mental health providers further out of the equation, and I am not just talking about psychiatrists. I could be wrong, but then again, I seem to be less pertinent every day as a psychiatrist. Some readers may smile with glee reading that last comment, but are people that preemptive to realize what will happen if psychiatry is deemed irrelevant?
In the end, it will be the patient who suffers most, being robbed of the opportunity to access the real specialists who embrace responsible mental health care treatment for the problems.
Hey, isn’t that what health care reform will wind up doing anyway?
Sleep well.
I don’t know I have seen “mental health” specialists and they pretty much did nothing for me. In fact the best care I get for my severe anxiety is from my internist. He prescribes the right combination of medications and I am happy to say I am doing great because of it. I don’t really care if I have to stay on the meds long term. It is what it is and if this is what is going to give me my life back then so be it.
I don’t know. My Internist does a fine job at helping me control my Panic/Anxiety symptoms. He has me on the perfect combination of medications and I have not had a bout with panic since I started these miracle pills. If I have to take a pill everyday to keep my normal life, I think it’s a small price to pay compared to the alternative.
Comments are closed.