You’d think that as people become more and more educated about the complex biological, social and psychological factors that go to make up mental illness, people would become more understanding and less stigmatizing. As we are on the cusp of having a nationwide ban from discriminating in mental healthcare reimbursements, you’d think government and ordinary people are getting the message.
Well, you would be wrong.
First, we learn from the Mental Health Blog that Nova Scotia almost began discriminating against drivers renewing their driver’s license because of a mental disorder. Their new renewal form initially had a question regarding one’s prior history of mental disorder diagnoses, as though there were any research to show that people with a mental illness somehow were responsible for more troubles related to driving than those without. Of course that’s just a ridiculous proposition, but the form still apparently asks the question about any mental or physical disability that might prevent someone from operating a motor vehicle.
That sort of general question about one’s ability to properly operate a motor vehicle is more appropriate, as long as it doesn’t single out mental disorders. I know of no mental disorder diagnosis that would be, in and of itself, sufficient grounds for denying one’s driving privileges, but one could make the case for some very extreme disorders that are not being sufficiently treated. But the likelihood of such severe, untreated mental disorders turning up in any quantities necessary to actually ask such a question on a form calls into question whether the people doing the actual approvals of these things are actually paying attention to who’s requesting the license.
Law.com brings us an article about how jury consultants and lawyers are now bouncing potential jurors from serving on jury duty because of their prescribed medications. While I wouldn’t want a juror nodding off during my trial either, it does seem to prying into the privacy of an individual volunteering to serve on a jury by delving too far deeply into their health or medical history. Are you really going to suggest it’s okay to suggest someone isn’t capable of serving on a jury because they took some Benadryl this morning? Since already half the population is on a regular medication, that would suggest a lawyer has a ready-made excuse to deny the right to sit on a jury by invoking the medication reason. Even if the medication is completely harmless or has no ill side effects in the particular individual (since side effects vary widely from person to person, even while on the same medication).
These kinds of actions seem to be only one short step away from outright discrimination against people who have perceived flaws that will affect their judgment or ability to adequately carry out the necessary actions, whether it be driving or making rational decisions about someone’s guilt or innocence. A mental disorder diagnosis is not a character flaw, nor prevents anyone from doing anything they want to in life. Nor is treatment for such a disorder automatically some sort of reliable filter to screen out a person from being able to drive a car or sit on a jury.
These sorts of stories are sad reminders of how much farther we have to go in terms of education and information to combat discrimination against people with mental illness.
Read the Mental Health Blog entry: Nova Scotia Discriminates Against Drivers with Mental Illness
Read the Law.com article: What’s Your Juror Taking?
5 comments
I guess I am just not surprised. It seems like everyone is asking what medicine we are on these days. From eye exams to mammograms we have to list our regular medications. What I don’t understand is why my employer recently asked me what medications I was on. It was part of a health questionairre for our protection in case of an emergency. If you refuse to answer then you what? I guess I just need to buy a t-shirt.
I went through hell with the Ministry of Transportation in Ontario. I’ve never been charged with a DUI but my licence was medically suspended because I was Dx’d alcohol dependent. My psychiatrist wrote the ministry after I’d been sober for six months, supported by weekly blood and urine tests, but she included a little too much about my mental health history. I got a letter saying that I had to submit another medical report in another 6 months, that stated I’d continued to be absitnant (more bloods and urine testing) and that I was “mentally stable.” I was annoyed but could at least understand the abstinance requirement but was enraged, about the mental stability requirement. I’m finally rid of ministry supervision – got the final letter this week saying my last medical report had been approved, but that I am required to report any change in my mental status. Yeah right. Like that will happen in a million years.
i have bi-polar and i see a whole team of people to help to try to gain some help in living a so called normal life. i get a ton of discrimination from practally everywhere. i want to be a lpn but cant get accepted into the program because of my illness and cosmetology schols ask if you have a phsycial or mental illness which i have to answer and sign it in order to even get a apprentance license, nevermind that they can take it away for that too. is that fare? i feel like i cant do what i want to career wise or be who i want to be because im coded bi-polar it isnt my fault i have this and i work very hard every week to obtain my goals 🙁 i hope people can some day accept that no matter if you have a mental illness or not your still human 🙁
I live in OKLAHOMA, USA
YEARLY (not when DL expires) Every year! I have to get letters from my doctors so they do not revoke my DL! Discrimination is alive and well in Oklahoma!
Oh and did I mention that they only give 30 days to get it all done?!
I have lived in 5 other states and never had this problem, maintained my DL for 33 years and have had a clean DL for over 20 years running but now may not have a DL!
I also moved to Oklahoma a couple of years ago. I feel your pain. I have bipolar disorder that has been successfully treated with no side effects for many years now. In my 20 years of driving I’ve never gotten into an accident and have a single speeding ticket! Virtually a perfect driving record. In some ways, my mental health makes me a better driver as I tend to hyper-focus on some tasks, one of which is driving.
Like you I also have to fill out those forms with very little notice. When the onset of my bipolar first hit me, while I was in a deep, deep depression, I had a very difficult time admitting I needed to seek help. Now knowing of the discrimination that exists, I don’t think I would have sought help, even though it was needed.
Luckily, I live close enough to the border of Arkansas that I can move there in a few years to rid myself of Oklahoma’s law.