With anything that changes, especially an important reference manual, people are going to be confused about what those changes actually mean. Nowhere is this more evident than in the 5th edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5).
As we noted yesterday, the final revision was approved for publication. The DSM-5 is how clinicians and researchers diagnose mental disorders in the United States. A common language is especially important when conducting research, to ensure treatments are actually working for the symptoms people have.
One of the changes getting a lot of attention is the “doing away” of Asperger’s Syndrome. But to be clear — Asperger’s isn’t being dropped from the DSM-5. It’s simply being merged and renamed, to better reflect a consensus of our scientific knowledge on the disorder as one form of the new “autism spectrum disorder” diagnosis.
So while the term, “Asperger’s” is going away, the actual diagnosis — you know, the thing that actually matters — is not.
But you wouldn’t know it reading some of the mainstream media’s reporting on this concern.
The board of trustees of the American Psychiatric Association, who released the approved changes on Saturday, said the reason they were renaming Asperger’s was “to help more accurately and consistently diagnose children with autism.” Which I agree with, because it’s important for clinicians and researchers to have a common, logical language. ((This is a good argument to do away with the terms “dysthmia” and “cyclothymia” as well, and just call them what they are — chronic depression and chronic bipolar disorder.))
I wish the media could differentiate between a label or word, and the actual diagnosis though. Because from the news coverage on this change, you’d believe the actual diagnosis was going away unless you read more carefully.
CBS News screams, Asperger’s syndrome dropped from American Psychiatric Association manual:
Asperger’s syndrome will be dropped from the latest edition of the psychiatrist’s “bible,” the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, or DSM-5.
It’s not until the third paragraph of this article do you realize the American Psychiatric Association, the publisher of the DSM-5, just decided to rename Asperger’s. (And why do so many media keep referring to a psychiatric diagnostic manual — a scientific instrument — as a “bible?” That is the strangest disconnect I keep reading time and time again. I’m not even sure any reporter who writes those words could tell you the reasoning behind calling it that.)
Fox News announced that “Asperger’s dropped from revised diagnosis manual,” but then quickly notes that it’s just the term that’s being dropped — not the actual diagnosis.
The UK’s Guardian does a little better, mentioning the renaming in its subtitle, “DSM-5, latest revision of Diagnostic and Statistical Manual, merges Asperger’s with autism and widens dyslexia category.”
So yes, the label of “Asperger’s syndrome” is leaving the diagnostic nomenclature, as our understanding of this disorder has increased substantially in the nearly 20 years since the DSM-IV was published. But the diagnosis itself remains, with a new label — as a mild form of autism spectrum disorder.
People who are currently receiving treatment and care for this disorder will continue to do so, and insurance companies, Medicaid and others will continue to cover the costs of treating it.
3 comments
I disagree with this statement from the article: “People who are currently receiving treatment and care for this disorder will continue to do so, and insurance companies, Medicaid and others will continue to cover the costs of treating it.”
I do not know about Medicaid, but our insurance does not cover anything having to do with the treatment of Asperger’s, or with Autism, for that matter. For IDEA, Asperger’s falls under the Autism category, so it does allow for school services, but it does NOT mean insurance will pay a single dollar for any therapy.
Does the new term for Asperger Syndrome can still protect and applies in the same manner to these individuals when going through the Department of Justice for criminal or civil action?
Here in the UK having been assessed for what is here a disability insurance that provides benefit for those unable to work through illness or disorder, i found that my diagnosis of Aspergers Syndrome had been transformed by Atos the healthcare assessing company into high functioning aspergers for the purposes of the report which withheld the benefit from me.I appealed an won, at least in part on the basis that there is no diagnostic catergory of high functioning aspergers and the assessor, who had no knowledge of autism, certainly could not have the decades of experience to differentiate between functional differences in autism.This merging will enable such nefarious companies to more easily refuse me access to financial benefits that i have paid into schemes to recieve by misrepresenting the levels of my difficulties.Already here we are seeing plans to limit educational assistance to only those with low functioning autism, no aspergers level, nor dyslexic or able to hear but registered deaf child will be eligible for educational support.This merging will go some ways to reinforcing that removal of support and for me, it is going to be the start of disability denial for many autistic children and adults.If Aspergers is still there as a diagnosis why the hell remove it?