As we noted a few days ago, the Golden Gate Bridge is finally getting a suicide barrier. However, it’s not so much a barrier as it is a net. A steel net, to be specific.
The net will be suspended from either side of the iconic span, and reach out about 20 feet. Out of the five barrier proposals considered, this is the only suicide barrier that will not interfere with tourists’ view from the bridge. It will also allow the 16 painters employed on the bridge to continue their current work routines (the other four barriers would’ve required additional effort and risk for the painters to do their work).
When people jump from the bridge into the net, it will hold them there, suspended some 740 feet over the entrance to the San Francisco Bay.
Denis Mulligan, the chief engineer of the bridge, recently explained to the San Francisco Chronicle how the net works — it envelops the suicide jumper, making it difficult, but not impossible, to get out:
“It wouldn’t be like a trampoline, that once you jump onto, it would be easy to jump off,” Mulligan said. But, he added, “If you’re very agile, very strong and focused, you may be able to climb out.”
The net will be angled and constructed in such a way as to make climbing out of it difficult. The 20 foot drop a person takes into the net will also likely be painful. The paper also described how the process would work in retrieving a person from the net:
During a rescue operation from the net, authorities would shut down a lane of traffic. A specialized vehicle, called a “snooper” truck, would be brought in. Outfitted with a mechanical arm similar to a cherry picker used by utility crews, two specially trained rescue workers would be lowered down to the net in a bucket to pull the person out.
A similar net was installed in Bern, Switzerland. According to the paper, “Researchers found that just the presence of the net stopped people from even trying to jump off the Munster Terrace, a medieval cathedral located in the old section of Bern, from which two or three people had been leaping to their deaths every year. They also found that the net did not shift suicides to other locations.”
Will it work on the Golden Gate Bridge? Prior research suggests that it will at least cut down on the number of successful attempts from the bridge.
After installation of suicide barriers on the Clifton suspension bridge in Bristol, England, researchers there found a significant decline in the number of successful suicides from the bridge. Importantly — and contrary to conventional wisdom — the researchers did not find an increase in jumps from other buildings or bridges in the area. In other words, people didn’t just go find another bridge to jump from.
A net is likely a less effective suicide barrier than a properly designed fence would be. It is hypothesized, however, that the net will work to take away the impulsiveness of the suicidal act. If you know ahead of time that the net is there, and will make it extremely painful and difficult (and in some cases, impossible) to actually complete the act, it’s likely most people will simply not bother trying.
Reference:
Bennewith, O., Nowers, M., & Gunnell, D. (2007). Effect of barriers on the Clifton suspension bridge, England, on local patterns of suicide: Implications for prevention. British Journal of Psychiatry, 190(3), 266-267.
Steel net preferred for halting bridge jumpers, San Francisco Chronicle
10 comments
Interesting read, and sad but a necessary. After looking at the images over at SFGate, I don’t really think that the net will hinder tourists views, and hopefully save a few lives per year. Well done SFO – it’s about time.
Pure waste of $50M taxpayer/commuter dollars. Jumpers from the GGB are not seeking notoriety as their names are not published. They want to die and will merely use their second choice method. Besides, injuries caused by hitting the net will NOW BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE GGB DISTRICT! Lawsuits pushed by greedy shysters will add on continuing and much higher costs…could be $50M each.
Hi John Hess,
You have a valid point.
In my opinion when a person has decided to take their own life, nothing and no-one can deter them.
Sad but true,
Regards
Dawn Pugh
http://www.dawnpugh.com
Slightly inaccurate – 740 Feet? The roadway is 240 ft above the water so the person would beheld 220 ft above the currents.
Seriously people, are all of you missing this part:
Importantly — and contrary to conventional wisdom — the researchers did not find an increase in jumps from other buildings or bridges in the area. In other words, people didn’t just go find another bridge to jump from.
Right they did not go find another bridge, they shot themselves, or took a handful of pills, or got some rope out. If someone wants to off themselves then it is not the State’s problem. People falling off the bridge, that is the states problem. People hurling themselves off the bridge on purpose, not the states problem. What is next, pillow tops on the front of buses? Stop selling rope? Daily stomach pumping sessions for all?
depression is real people, it is a disease. You don’t make fun of breast cancer patients that try to seek a cure by any means, do you? Loneliness, feeling there is no hope – a result of very low serotonin levels. Watch out, when you get to 70 years old and is admitted to a nursing home, you will have a 50 per cent chance of attempting suicide your first year in the nursing home. unthinking idiotic comments, I guess to see your name on the internet: there may be a similarity psychologically between you and jumpers.
According to this, the oft-referenced bridge nets at the Bern Cathedral did not work and did not displace jumping from other locations:
http://www.ithacaisfences.org/uploads/5/6/6/0/5660846/suicide_nets_in_bern.pdf
Well, it’s hard to judge this paper, since it’s not been peer-reviewed and doesn’t appear in a journal (like the paper it’s critiquing has).
But even if the critique is correct (I don’t have time right now to analyze it), others have shown the effectiveness of suicide barriers around the world. See here for a nice summary:
http://www.ithacajournal.com/assets/pdf/CB158162520.PDF
Suicide barriers work; this isn’t debated amongst suicide professionals any longer. The only legitimate debate about suicide barriers is how they should be paid for and deployed.