When a new TV seasons starts up and one of the hit shows is about sex addiction, suddenly everyone is focused on sexual addiction. “Look, a new disorder!” “Look, David Duchovny actually has it!” Like most other compulsive behavioral conditions, sexual addiction is not recognized as a “real” disorder by the psychiatric diagnostic book, the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (the DSM).
However, unlike most other behavioral compulsions, sexual addiction does have a fairly rich and long research history (over 550 citations appear in PsycINFO on sexual addiction). The concept of sexual addiction, according to Levin and Troiden (1988), first came from a member of a Boston-area Alcoholics Anonymous chapter, who recognized his sexual behaviors as something he called “sex and love addiction.” He then adopted the 12 steps to this problem, which then began to spread and was eventually picked up by psychology clinicians and researchers. The first professional conceptualization and description of sexual addiction in the research literature appeared in 1983 (by Carnes, an ex-prison psychologist, who claimed he actually discovered the problem in the 1970s but didn’t write about it until years later). Debate swirled back and forth about the legitimacy of these labels when they first appeared on the scene.
Sexual addiction, like other behavioral compulsions outside of gambling, has never made it into the DSM, however (contrary to what is claimed in the Wall Street Journal article, which inaccurately states it was in the DSM-III [don’t newspapers fact-check any more?]). In fact, the DSM-IV, the most current revision of this book, makes absolutely no mention of the concept of sexual compulsions or addiction, not even under categories for further study. Given that the DSM-IV was published in 1994, a full decade after the concept of “sexual addiction” made it onto the research scene, it does suggest that this is a category that was never seriously considered a full-blown disorder unto itself.
So Why Isn’t Sexual Addiction a Recognized Disorder?
It’s hard to say with any certainty. Levin and Troiden (1988) argue that simply shifting societal values are the main reason to blame. They also bemoaned both the soft science underlying the supposed condition and the spate of media attention of “sexual addiction” in the 1980s (not unlike the media attention given to this same concern nearly 20 years later!). Levin and Troiden also level many additional criticisms at “sexual addiction” as a stand-alone disorder, but most of them are comparatively weak and technical in nature.
Compulsions, as defined by the DSM-IV, are not something that bring a person pleasure. That is why gambling is defined as simply “pathological” and not “compulsive.” The only recognition in the DSM-IV that a person might engage in an enjoyable sexual activity to some extreme is the inclusion of a class of sexual disorders known as paraphilias. Paraphilias are “recurrent, intense sexually arousing fantasies, sexual urges, or behaviors generally involving (1) nonhuman objects, (2) the suffering or humiliation of oneself or one’s partner, or (3) children or other nonconsenting persons.” So while arguably the DSM-IV recognizes sexual compulsions, it’s only in the context of some sexual object, scene or person.
One can’t deny the people who flock to clinicians’ doors looking for treatment for sexual addiction, however, no more than one can deny that people believe they are “addicted” to the Internet. What is both amazing and a little disturbing, however, is to see entire professional societies, such as the Society for the Advancement of Sexual Health, spring up around a disorder that isn’t even officially recognized as such. And despite no clinical agreed-upon criteria for sex addiction, the Society estimates that 3 to 5% of Americans have it.
9 comments
I’m always reminded of one of my first clinical psychology lectures. One of the first addictions was considered to be golfing!! (Way back in the day).
I agree that new ‘addictions’ need to be seriously considered in the light of the current cultural trends. One of the main drivers behind new addictions is finding new ways to sell drugs by pharmaceutical companies. Who can forget that ‘Social anxiety disorder’ had never existed until there was a drug to sell. Before then it would have been ‘extreme shyness’
Although I agree with the comment above that pharmacological industry is the main thrust behind inclusion of many psychiatric disorders in DSM-IV, I don’t think excessive interest in sexual activities or excessive indulgence in sexual pleasure should be a disorder until and unless it causes severe problem in occupation, social and academic life of a person and it causes significant distress in the life of the person so much so that he is himself forced to consult any psychiatrict for the treatment of some obsessive behaviours.
Great blog! This website also has some interesting articles on controlling emotions:
http://www.searchforbalance.org
“In fact, the DSM-IV, the most current revision of this book, makes absolutely no mention of the concept of sexual compulsions or addiction”
You’re wrong, there *ARE* sexual compulsions listed in the DSM IV:
Exhibitionism, Fetishism, Frotteurism, Pedophilia, Sexual Masochism, Sexual Sadism, Transvestic Fetishism & Voyeurism.
Generic sexual addiction presumably isn’t listed for the same reason homosexuality isn’t listed any more – most people don’t consider it either a problem or a disorder 😉
Of course I should have said “concept of a general addiction to sex.” I mentioned the disorders you noted two paragraphs down, and what makes them separate and distinct from a more general concept of “sexual addiction” (e.g., addicted to sex itself).
Sexual compulsions exist, they are getting worse (thanks to the internet), and they cause pain and suffering. I don’t see how anyone can dispute this fact. Professionals I deeply respect come down on different sides of the question of whether “sexual addiction” exists. No question the name may be much less accurate than the one I believe we will wind up with. Eli Coleman Ph.D. suggests we call it “Syndrome X.” No professional would say that someone suffered a “nervous breakdown.” But when laypeople say “sexual addiction,” they know what they are talking about.
I worry that the debate about the name of this problem will interfere with people coming in to get treatment for sexual compulsions which pull them farther and farther away from the capacity to want to to experience what I feel is a very wonderful and human experience: sexual intimacy with a live, flesh and blood, imperfect, human with their own needs. Relational sex is imperfect. Always has been. Always will be.
When you look at the internalized and media-driven pressure on men to have instant, rock hard erections seamlessly no matter what, you can see some of the forces that make masturbating to computer porn so enticing. Who can deny that it’s easier to have a mind-blowing orgasm when you don’t have to worry about the back and forth communicating that is a central part of coupled sex? But this is like the Gresham’s Law of sexuality: pornographic sex beats out intimate sex.
When people get so caught up in this pattern of compulsive, non-relational sex that they cannot stop, even when they want to, and they ruin relationships and make having eyeball-to-eyeball sexual pleasure with someone they care for an impossibility,
they need help. They deserve help. Why make them feel crazy for needing help with a condition that doesn’t have enough research or isn’t listed in the DSM. Look at what we understand about sexual trauma that we didn’t understand 15 years ago!
Thanks for opening up this topic.
Aline Zoldbrod Ph.D.
Boston, Massachusetts
http://www.SexSmart.com
I find it ridiculous that in the upcoming DSM V, only gambling can be qualified as a behavioral addiction, and that internet addiction and sexual addiction are not disorders that can be diagnosed.
The research done on sexual addiction is more than sufficient to have it qualify as an addiction in the DSM V. The research data includes the brain mapping of sexual addicts and recovered sexual addicts. It has been clearly shown that the brain mapping matches the chemical addiction studies.
For those curious to learn more, check http://www.sexintegrate.com,
and go to “What is a sex addict.â€
Thanks for addressing such a taboo topic, John.
Paul P. Shepard, Ph.D., CSAT
Oakland, California
I agree with quite a few of the comments that have been left on this page. I do find it hard to believe that gambling is the only behavioral addiction in the DSM-V. It is clear that there has been extensive research on sexual addiction, as well as many other addictions that could probably be diagnosed.
Hopefully, there will be further research in this and possibly a definitive decision on this.