What if someone you loved had a mental disorder that nobody knew how to treat? The disorder causes your loved one to act out against others, because they see hallucinations or believe delusions about others trying to harm them.
Sometimes, the delusions might cause them to act out, sometimes even harming other people.
Medical and psychological science don’t yet have all the answers. Sadly, we cannot treat, much less cure, everyone with every concern.
But medicine and science have come a long way from the 1950s, when all we did was handcuff people to chairs or strap them into beds in order to deal with unruly or violent behavior.
Or has it?
According to a story last week reported by the Associated Press in The Washington Post, there are dozens of cases of people reportedly being locked up, sometimes in restraints, for years for these kinds of behaviors — often against the law, and against all modern treatment protocols.
In Florida, the state lost a lawsuit in 1998 and was forced to pay $18 million for strapping a man to a bed or wheelchair for 2 1/2 years.
Connecticut has paid $600,000 a year since 2002 to house a former patient at a special facility in California as part of an out-of-court settlement. He had been tied to a bed in a small, concrete room at Connecticut Valley Hospital in Middletown for more than a year, said Susan Aranoff, an attorney with the nonprofit Connecticut Legal Rights Project who fought for his transfer. […]
In Virginia, one man was locked in a three-room suite for 15 years and another patient was held in a similar setup for five years. Connecticut and Florida have paid millions over allegations that they tethered patients to furniture for years.
Federal law requires that seclusion or restraints — including drugs — be used on patients covered by Medicare or Medicaid only in emergencies to protect other patients and staff. Such measures can be used for more than 24 hours only if a physician deems it necessary, and only if a doctor updates that assessment daily.
The three-room suite is a luxury compared to some cases reported upon. And the 24-hour measure is easily bypassed (as hospitals have learned) by simply having a doc sign off on the chart once a day (with no actual new assessment being performed). Although ethically, no doctor should ever do such a thing, it’s done nonetheless as the path of least resistance for these difficult-to-treat patients.
The answer is simple — money and resources. It’s cheaper to lock people up in their own private suite than to provide the 24/7 care and treatment to help them find a road to at least partial recovery.
In 1997, Pennsylvania enacted stricter policies against those techniques, trained staff in crisis management and established minimum staffing levels for its psychiatric facilities. Today, the state does not seclude or restrain patients for extended periods and rarely uses either method at all, according to the state mental health agency.
Such efforts can be costly, but proponents cite them as proof that with the right support, any mentally ill person can improve enough to safely interact with others.
In a time of a bad economy, however, the first services to be cut are often those that are seen as unnecessary — such as cutting back on proper mental health care and services for the poor and indigent.
So it comes down to the age-old societal question: Do we care about those who are worse off than ourselves? And if so, how willing are we, as a society, to ensure such people are taken care of properly, rather than warehoused in locked wards, tied to beds and wheelchairs, as was common in the 1950s and 1960s?
Do we really want to go back to such “care” or do we want to recognize that such disorders could affect anyone, at any time, even someone we love? In the months ahead, the new government will help forge decisions on such care (through funding of federal Medicare programs and such). Decisions that can ensure proper treatment and care for not just dozens, but hundreds of people who need help — not restraints — from society.
Read the full article: Mental patients isolated for years despite laws
4 comments
Even though I study these things and these things are my career, I can never quite understand (besides explaining it away by assuming money has something to do with it) why this type of treatment continues. Where are the programs that do monthly/yearly evaluations on these hospitals? Aren’t they suppose to assure families that their loved ones’ rights will be protected? Why aren’t these evaluators aware of such patients being locked up? Why aren’t families suing?
I don’t think there is enough supervision over these mental health facilities. Therefore, patients are treated poorly because the staff has no one over them to correct them or lay down the rules.
Sadly and very unsettling is the reality that some pet shops are taken better care of than mental health facilities. Some pets are even treated better when hospitalized.
This has to change.
In the past decade, every year has found me spending at least two months in a psychiatric ward, until 2007. I have found that even though I have concerned friends and one who has my medical Power of Attorney, this doesn’t count in mental illness.
I have undergone over twenty ECTs, agreed to when I was too sick to care, been five-pointed, prescribed Thorazine for suicidal depression and released from a three month stay three days after I opened up my wrists with a scalpel another patient gave me. Though, they did send me to the local ER to have me sewn up.
Ray Sanford is undergoing ECT, despite his clear and vocal objections. ECT took away three years of my memory in just over twenty shocks. I don’t know of any psych med that would be so swiftly damaging.
The terrible treatments that you write of are shocking and yet I am not surprised. Our place as patients is “below the salt” in terms of value and position. We who are mentally diagnosed are feared, misunderstood, shunned and stigmatized. Our illness is seen as a character flaw, our suffering as malingering, our behavior as something to be contained, however that might be.
Criminal charges of kidnapping, wrongful imprisonment and restraint should be brought on anyone using such means beyond a crisis intervention mode.
As to Tamra’s comment, my family has shut me out, as they cannot handle my mental diagnoses. I am over twenty-one and single. A medical Power of Attorney, as I said before, only applies to any “physical” illness. Now that’s mental!
Dano, I’m so sorry to hear about your family and your struggle with finding treatment. That’s terribly saddening. Family should be more mature and supportive than that. Who needs family if they cannot support you no matter what you’re going through? Whoever supports you and shows you that they love you no matter what are worth your time and I hope you find that person. If not, life goes on right?
You are right about the mentally ill being misunderstood. Many are and that’s why society continues to be blind to mental illness and its great need. A lot of treatments are used, but some are used unsuccessfully. Unfortunately, doctors rely on the next best thing when one thing doesn’t work and this could continue for years. It’s discouraging to have an illness in the first place, to have a society that doesn’t care/understand, and treatments that may or may not work. But don’t lose hope 🙂
I have a good friend in your shoes. It is very upsetting and I hope to continue to be an advocate for people like you. Maltreatment of the mentally needy is wrong and it needs to change.
Best regards
http://www.activeminds.org