The United States is in the midst of its rite of choosing its next President. As a blog focused on mental health and psychology, we can’t help but wonder about the candidates’ commitment to mental health and psychological science. We should note that we hold no specific political agenda and endorse neither candidate at this time. Because this article is so long, we’ve provided an easy-to-read summary of our findings at they very end.
One way to determine a candidate’s position on such issues is to send out a questionnaire about mental health policy issues and ask the candidates to fill it out. This is what NAMI does (and did a year ago for the two current candidates), and you can view the responses here.
Not unexpectedly, Obama’s campaign responded by “Strongly supporting” every question asked about a mental health issue. You can’t go wrong filling it out that way, regardless of your intentions, because it means easy votes that nobody will ever hold you to if you become President. (His campaign also provided this statement when queried further about his stance on mental illness issues.)
McCain’s campaign either saw how ridiculous and transparent the survey was, or didn’t want to be painted into any corners early on, and declined to answer the questionnaire. But he did provide a statement about mental health care, a part of which I’ll quote:
Mental health is a necessary complement to physical health in all aspects of our daily lives. Fortunately, the path to greater quality and lower costs is to recognize this fact and where possible provide incentives to treat physical and behavioral health together. Chronic disease is a dominant component of the growth in spending on health care and many of our citizens with chronic illnesses have a behavioral health problem as well. For example, untreated depression raises dramatically the cost of treating the physical ailments of a diabetic. A sensible goal is to design reimbursement for taking care of the whole patient, whatever ails them, and recognize the essential role mental health treatment plays in the overall health of the patient and the reduction in physical health needs.
I have stressed the central role of personal responsibility in leading to lower health care costs. Personal fitness and better lifestyles, especially reduction in addictions of all types — food, narcotics, or cigarettes — can yield dramatic improvements in the cost of chronic illness and highâ€cost medical care. We can do a better job of treating addictions, but we also have an obligation to do a better job of teaching our children the benefits of good lifestyles and the perils of addictive activities.
Good stuff, and without saying it, apparently agrees with mental health parity but stresses personal responsibility, especially in regards to addictions (suggesting maybe he wouldn’t take them as seriously as other mental health concerns).
I don’t think the questionnaire route is a very good one to determine the candidates’ stances on these issues, because politicians are used to promising everything and then delivering little (with plenty of excuses and rationalizations for not making good on their promises).
No, the better and more reliable way of looking at a candidate’s stance is simply to look at what they’ve voted for and supported in the past, and how their home states do in the area of mental health care. After all, as representatives in the Senate of their respective states, they are partially responsible for how their states approach mental healthcare.
Voting Records of McCain and Obama
We looked at the voting records of McCain and Obama in their capacity as Senators for their respective home states over the past few years to gauge their typical voting patterns on a number of issues directly relevant to mental health and psychology.
Medicare/Medicaid Bills
Mental health providers need to be adequately reimbursed for providing their services, or else they get out of the business. Medicare is a huge source of funding for mental health providers. So passage of the 2008 Medicare bill, which extended important expiring provisions under the program that improves beneficiary access to preventive and mental health services, enhances low-income benefit programs, and maintains access to care in rural areas, including pharmacy access, is a key indicator of support. The Senate passed the bill with a veto-proof override on July 15, 2008, 70 to 26. McCain did not vote on the bill, nor did Obama. They were too busy campaigning to bother to cast their votes. Cloture was needed, however, to get this bill to a vote. Obama did vote yes on the cloture vote, while McCain did not vote on cloture.
Earlier in the year, an important amendment reached the Senate that would halt the cut of certain Medicaid programs that were designed to help low-income families get themselves out of poverty, including case management services and rehabilitation services. These services were targeted at people with mental illness to help them manage their medications and live a healthy life within their communities instead of being imprisoned or hospitalized. McCain, busy again on the campaign trail, did not vote. Obama voted Yes.
10 comments
Wow, another reason to not vote for McCain. If I could have prevented having bipolar disorder, I WOULD HAVE.
John McCain’s health care straight talk, if one is seriously seeking answers, gives us what we need. To be able to pick mental health care coverage if a person needs it is all that is necessary. To demand it be provided in all policies, and make everyone pay for it is as beneficial as making a man pay for OB/GYN coverage.
Choosing is where it’s at.
Barrack Obama’s presentation of provision, well, let’s just say he’d make Karl Marx proud. I am not a socialist, nor do I wish for the USA to become more socialistic than it already is. Young voters may vote for his type of social reforms, but they will regret that decision later in life, once they realize the horrible outcomes from it.
Give me choices that mean something to me, and I’m a happy camper. So far, McCain wins on this battle.
McCain is still just riding Bush’s coattails, although I’m not sure why given Bush’s record.
Obama recognizes that those of us struggling with a mental disorder should be equal to that of those with a physical disorder. Too many homeless people have a mental disorder and have no where to go, except to jail for a day or two to get a hot meal.
Shameful – we treat animals better than that!
And if the two candidates aren’t speaking up enough about it get involved and speak up yourself – if we’re loud enough they will hear it!
It’s interesting that comment about choices – McCain’s ‘plan’ doesn’t figure in the mental health needs for those who don’t have a choice i.e. they are low-income and may not have enough of a support system to know where they can get help. Obama’s health care plan encourages responsibility and choice for those with the mental and financial means. For those that don’t have so many options, there is help. As a society, we must remember that we all benefit when we help the less fortunate to help themselves.
I intend to vote for McCain.
I do not want to send my 6 yrs. granddaughter into poverty with so many government programs.
My son, age 30 works part time and I have to pay his health insurance. He has bipolar disorder, obssesive-compulsive and attention disorder.
He lives with us because I want to know what he is doing. We encourage him to join support groups, but would appreciate some type of government aid if that is possible.
I am sure there are thousands of persons in the same situation.
NAMI is a great comfort to me and we must all band together for this cause and education of our citizenry and politicians about mental illness.