There’s an even more tragic story behind the news of people traveling from around the country to drop off their unwanted children in Nebraska, since they enacted a law a few weeks ago that allowed any child under 18 years of age to be handed over to the state with no questions asked of the parent or guardian.
Thirty of the 34 children dropped off had previously received mental health treatment, 11 of them at an intensive or inpatient level.
In other words, these weren’t just unwanted children. These were unwanted children that mostly suffered from ignored, under-treated or untreated mental health concerns.
The Iowa Independent has the story:
“If we would have had this same law in Iowa, the same thing would have happened here,” Estle said. “I suspect that if we really look at the kids who are being dropped off in Nebraska — particularly the adolescents — many of those will be young people who have serious emotional problems. My hunch is that parents are utterly frustrated at not being able to access services. So, they are using that law as an act of desperation because they can’t get services.”
It’s not that their parents and guardians haven’t tried, it’s just that such services can be hard to find and may be even harder to pay for. Such is the story of Carrisa Gatley:
Such was definitely the case for former Iowa resident Carrisa Gatley, a single parent who has an 11-year-old son with severe mental disabilities. She hasn’t left her kid in Nebraska but she admits she could imagine it.
“Shortly after [our son] turned 3, my husband left,” Gatley said in a telephone interview Wednesday. “I didn’t blame him. I actually envied him — that he could escape the hell that came with trying to deal with everything.”
Gatley said it wasn’t just her son’s violent episodes, which have become increasingly dangerous as he’s grown older, but the constant and often depressing task of fighting with the insurance company, medication changes, food restrictions and trying to locate service providers.
Indeed, Gatley’s story isn’t unique. There’s no dearth of people who find navigating the current mental health system — especially if you are poor or have a small income with little or no health insurance — daunting and frustrating. And what’s worse is that even if you do find adequate treatment for your child, the associated costs of medications may simply be too much.
If you’re one of the “lucky” ones who have insurance coverage for your dependent child for a mental illness, plan on spending hours every month on the phone ensuring treatment is paid for and you can find a new treatment provider when your old one leaves the plan because of poor reimbursement and too much paperwork. (Therapists, too, spend hours every month on the same phone calls with insurance companies, trying desperately to track down missing payments, or payments for services they’ve provided but the insurance company later decides they don’t want to reimburse for.)
This is growing epidemic in America, one where we increasingly label misbehaving children as “mentally ill,” and then seek to prescribe off-label powerful antipsychotic medications to try and help.
While I have no doubt we’re finding an uptick in childhood diagnoses for such (questionable) disorders as pediatric bipolar disorder because of a real recognition of these very real problems in some children, I also think some professionals who are in a position to make such diagnoses may be over-diagnosing children based upon inadequate criteria and perhaps poor judgment.
It will take action on the part of each individual state to help fix the problems with their mental health treatment and care systems. And it will be difficult in an economy and environment like the one we have today. But Nebraska has shown this is not something that you can just sweep under the rug. Because if you do, the children ultimately will be the ones to suffer.
Read the full article: Behind Nebraska’s abandoned kids, a national shortage of mental health care
6 comments
the ny times just broke the story that the nebraska legislature changed the safe haven law today. the new law goes into effect on saturday.
now the law does not protect “children” but instead infants under 30 days old.
Thanks for the update, 314159pi. While IMHO it makes sense that it only applies to infants, I’m sure crunched state budgets that had something to do with it.
I’m hoping SCHIP is having an impact on low-income families with such needs. Anybody know if it has?
While the thought of abandoning a child is horrifying, the families of these children have themselves been abandoned by our healthcare system.I am the parent of a mentally ill adult, and a child (adopted) who has had a (hopefully temporary) hallucinatory reaction to a prescription for ADHD. It is almost impossible to find anyone who takes their state insurance. There are many days when, with my older child, I just wanted to get into my car and drive til the doors fell off.Brings new meaning to the phrase,”Abandon all hope, ye who enter here.” We spend a fortune in a war, and flying to the moon. What about mentally ill children? They are the future homeless and incarcerated of tomorrow!
While the thought of abandoning a child is horrifying, the families of these children have themselves been abandoned by our healthcare system.I am the parent of a mentally ill adult, and a child (adopted) who has had a (hopefully temporary) hallucinatory reaction to a prescription for ADHD. It is almost impossible to find anyone who takes their state insurance. There are many days when, with my older child, I just wanted to get into my car and drive til the doors fell off.Brings new meaning to the phrase,”Abandon all hope, ye who enter here.” We spend a fortune in a war, and flying to the moon. What about mentally ill children? They are the future homeless and incarcerated of tomorrow!
At least they can get help rather than just being on the street.
Why they would stop this program because it is working, or needed is bizarre.
Can you imagine shutting down the fire department because people keep calling when their house is on fire?