Does having an abortion lead to a greater likelihood of having future mental health problems?
That’s what a study by Priscilla Coleman and her colleagues published in 2009 in the Journal of Psychiatric Research claimed. She said the data showed a direct, temporal relationship. In other words, after a woman had an abortion, they were more likely to report a serious mental health concern later in their life.
However, when other researchers (Steinberg & Finer, 2012) tried to replicate Coleman et al.’s findings, they could not do so. After conferring with the original authors and digging through the data a little more, they discovered the problem.
Coleman et al. had misrepresented a very important component of their original research. They never looked at a person’s recent or current psychiatric diagnosis. Instead, they had asked only about any diagnosis in their entire lifetime — something that meant they had no data about whether such a diagnosis was made before or after the abortion.
Here’s what the New York Times reported:
[…] Priscilla Coleman of Bowling Green State University and her co-authors included all lifetime mental health disorders in their analysis, rather than only those instances occurring after the abortion took place. They were “hoping,” she says in a letter defending her methodology, “to capture as many cases of mental health problems as possible,” by including a longer period of time.
Well…. uh, okay. But you obviously can’t make statements about possible causal relationships in the data when you look at lifetime prevalence rates of mental disorders, versus actual current diagnoses around the time of the abortion.
In further defending their decision, Coleman now relies on a series of if-then statements to make her case (rather than, you know, actual data). She now says that the “majority of mental health problems likely occurred after the abortions” because most of the abortions studied occurred before age 21, but the health data used in the study were not obtained until they were, on average, age 33.
So? She goes on to cite the factoid that most common mental disorders — anxiety and mood disorders — are diagnosed between ages 25 and 45-53, making the case that these were unlikely childhood disorders that were being measured.
But the stark reality is plainer — we don’t know what the true numbers are from this study, because the researchers looked only at the lifetime prevalence rate. Without having that important piece of information — when a mental disorder was diagnosed — one cannot make any definitive statements about the temporal order of these things.
Julia Steinberg of the University of California at San Francisco and Lawrence Finer (2012) of the Guttmacher Institute found what they called, in a letter to the journal’s editors, “untrue statements about the nature of the dependent variables and associated false claims about the nature of the findings.”
“This is not a scholarly difference of opinion,” Dr. Steinberg said. “Their facts were flatly wrong. This was an abuse of the scientific process to reach conclusions that are not supported by the data.”
It would not surprise me that, at least temporarily, people who go through an abortion experience significant emotional turmoil. After all, contrary to the way some people portray abortion, it is not a quick and emotionally painless procedure. It carries emotional wounds — even under the best of circumstances for many women. So indeed researchers should try and better understand the nature and course of those wounds.
But it needs to be done with thoughtful, careful research… Not slipshod research that, to some, looks like it’s carrying a political agenda.
Read the full New York Times article: Study Linking Abortion and Mental Health Problems Is Called False
References
Coleman, P.K., Coyle, C.T., Shuping, M., & Rue, V.M. (2009). Induced abortion and anxiety, mood, and substance abuse disorders: Isolating the effects of abortion in the national comorbidity survey. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 43, 770-776.
Kessler, R.C. & Schatzberg, A.F. (2012). Commentary on Abortion Studies of Steinberg and Finer (Social Science & Medicine 2011; 72:72 — 82) and Coleman (Journal of Psychiatric Research 2009;43:770 — 6 & Journal of Psychiatric Research 2011;45:1133 — 4). Journal of Psychiatric Research, 45, 410-411.
Steinberg, J.R. & Finer, L.B. (2012). Coleman, Coyle, Shuping, and Rue make false statements and draw erroneous conclusions in analyses of abortion and mental health using the National Comorbidity Survey. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 45, 407-408.
9 comments
I regret that I became pregnant (irresponsibly) several times, I regret…
If I had not ended the pregnancy(s), I and the child(ren) would have suffered mental issues.
In fact, I married the father of my first pregnancy and it changed all of our lives and not necessarily for the best.
I do not recommend using abortions as a form of contraception; my OB/GYN would not prescibe birth control pills because of possible blood clots.
Advice from a professional… he also arranged with a clinic not far from my town to schedule the abortions.
At 58 years old, I am not neurotic, psychotic nor suicidal. I feel that I did the right thing for the unborn fetus; only my opinion.
I was sick to my stomach when I read this. I know women who chose to abort their babies and for years struggled with regret, shame,etc. They had nightmares, panic attacks…you name it, they had it They all definitely had PTSD…abortion is something that affects you for life – although people who are pro-Abortion will never admit it. If you would walk into any Crisis Pregnancy Center in this country (not Planned Parenthood), you would hear heartbreaking stories of what women have endured as a result of that choice. And if counselors & psychologists were honest, they would tell you they see the long-term affects of abortion in their offices everyday. Almost 40 years and millions of babies later….you can’t tell me there isn’t a proven link to abortion & later developing a mental disoder….what do you call PTSD?
John,
This is by far not the only study done on this matter that came to that conclusion. I found one online that I can’t find now. And I read one at the library that was very thorough that really struck home. I have to admit that what I will add here is biased as I was looking for answer to my own situation. So take my laymen’s biased opinion for what it is. I will add that picking out one study and attacking it is unhealthy politics of psychology. Much more needs to be studied on this subject.
As I shared my story on here about loosing my wife to antidepressants, there is of course a much more complex story as there always is in a human psyche. The events that happened that lead to her being prescribed the meds was a mild anxiety/ depression once our child arrived. Now, I knew she had an abortion not too long before we had met, but that had been over a decade prior. Much growth had occurred. But shortly after the arrival of our daughter, she started to express feelings of inadequacy. She was asking me if I thought she was a good mom, and then flat out stating that she wasn’t. I isn’t understand. I really hadn’t ever seen a more attentive mother. She was fantastic. The lack of confidence and her behavior was irrational and the first signs of being out of character. Even as we were going through the divorce process, all she wanted to know from me was if I thought she was a good parent. I have grown to believe that because A) she was raised in a catholic family and attended catholic school where abortion is considered an abomination. She still was a semi active member of the church with us getting married in the church and making sure our daughter got baptized. B) her parents never knew and were hidden from the fact. She never shared her experience with anybody except her friend that had taken her and of course me. In another oddity, in the time when mania ensued that lead to the divorce, I found that she had recently reconnected with the guy who got her pregnant. From the PTSD and a Freudian perspective, this seemed to be fraught with the possibility of explanation.
I stumble upon this as a possible piece to the puzzle while plugging in some of the stuff she said. I found a summary of a study that reported that women who had miscarriages were more likely to suffer PPD and report feelings of inadequacy and that the percentages went up when the pregnancy was voluntarily aborted upon having another child. I guess my criticism would be that here is a post attacking only one study instead of a concept or theory and the inadequate methods of all the studies. Here is a piece with lots of sources cited that affirm the theory.
http://www.deveber.org/text/chapters/Chap15.pdf
(On an unrelated note. I comment on your post often. I am not quite sure in this format how I should address you and show respect. You are a doctor, should I all you Dr. Grohol, Doc, John. I do appreciate your post and learn much from them.)
If I had an abortion, I would never have been able to live with the guilt of killing an unborn child. I would have been in a very bad mental health way. This article is bunk. There is a reaction for every action and if you have a continuous, you would have to carry it around for life. As it is I have tried for 25 years to have a child, and people are killing them left and right. This is propaganda. Unless your a sociopath, you are going to have emotional aftermath.
Just being a women, I know how much it effects the mind. You dont have to believe in a God.
This is really shocking research design!
wow, so these pro-life-schizophrenic-fascists went from abortion causes mental illness to it can cause a mental “problem”.
feeling a little bit upset and down after an abortion, is normal — and not something to alarm people.
i feel a little bit upset and down after i lose a video game battle on my xbox — is normal.
maybe telling the truth about religion and abortion– will help reduce these feelings:
THE BIBLE: the bible supported abortion, that was done by a priest, in god’s name, in his holly temple! the 1984 NIV footnote of numbers 5:11-31 explained what “to thy thigh to rot, they belly to swell†meant: numbers 5:21 “or causes you to have a miscarrying womb and barrenness†to CAUSE a miscarrying womb IS an abortion.
‘Ephraim, as I saw Tyre, is planted in a pleasant place; but Ephraim shall bring forth his children to the murderer.†Give them, O LORD – what wilt Thou give? Give them a miscarrying womb and dry breasts…Ephraim is smitten, their root is dried up, they shall bear no fruit; yea, though they bring forth, yet will I slay even the beloved fruit of their womb.’
HOSEA 9-16
evilbible com skepticsannotatedbible com/says_about/abortion
the judeo-christian god is a myth and historical evidence proves it:
3.3.3 ATHEISM: A HISTORY OF GOD (Part 1)- Evid3nc3 2nd Foundational Falsehood of Creationism-AronRa Prove that Jesus is imaginary in less than 5 minutes – GIIVideo Christianity Exposed (Part II: Angry Magician in a Mountain) – JezusRa
galerouth blogspot com/
telling the truth about abortion from a scientific point of view will help:
THIS IS SCIENCE: FETUS IS NOT A BABY (GOOGLE THE HUMAN DEVELOPMENT CHART), but a parasite because the classification of the biological relationship that is based on the behavior one organism (fetus) and how it relates to the woman’s body:
as a zygote, it invaded the woman’s uterus using its TROPHOBLAST cells, hijacked her immune system by using NEUROKININ B and HCG— so her body doesn’t kill it, steals her nutrients to survive, and causes her harm or potential death.
galerouth blogspot com/
Zombiemeathead,
Everybody brings their own bias to this discussion. The reason abortion is a hot button issue is because it strikes at the core of what it means to be human. Wrapped around it are questions of life, responsibility, parents, and the definition of all of those. Personal perspective is all relevant to our experiences. That is what makes us all different. So the moral questions posed by abortion are attached to many of our base beliefs. And in our beliefs there are “lie(f)s.â€
The truth is that there are too many variables to the psyche question when it comes to abortion. Because an abortion is an action most of the time as a response to a mistake. Even in my own story, as I try to unwrap and answer the questions that haunt me, I can pin my exs feelings of inadequacy on the abortion. But the truth is that is not a scientific analysis. If I was countering my own argument, I would say, “but how do we know that what lead her to have an unwanted pregnancy isn’t the cause of her inadequate feelings?†There is no way to remove all the variables from a human being and conduct an experiment in the terms of pure scientific method.
No scientist with integrity will tell you when life begins, cause we don’t know. There is no definitive marker to say, “here, this is when life startsâ€. One thing is for certain, to a scientist, a parasite IS a life. Believe you me, if NASA found parasites on Mars, they would be jumping for joy and proclaim they, “Had found life on Mars!!†To me, that is what makes this attack on a single study a bit reckless.