Do people like to keep busy for no reason? Or is being idle okay with most of us?
Psychological researchers (Ysee et al., 2010) set to find out.
In two experiments with college students, researchers discovered that we can be happy doing nothing at all and remaining idle. But given even the slimmest of reasons to be busy doing something, and most people will opt for doing something over nothing.
The researchers also found that people were happier when they were busy, even if they were forced into busyness.
How can people be happy being busy, if that busyness serves no purpose?
In the first experiment, researchers had 98 students fill out surveys individually, and then gave them a choice before filling out a second survey 15 minutes after completing the first — they could drop off the first survey nearby and basically spend the next 15 minutes waiting for the next survey to begin. Or they could walk 15 minutes round trip to drop the first survey off in a different location. In each condition, they were rewarded with a piece of candy.
However, two experimental groups were created — those who were offered the same type of candy at both locations, and those who were told that each location where they could drop off the survey offered a different type of equally-attractive candy. Given that the candy was equally attractive at either location, one would think there’d be no reason to walk to the farther away location just to get a different piece of candy.
Yet the experimenters found that more people were willing to walk to the far away location to drop off their survey when told it was a different piece of candy than when it was the same piece of candy. The researchers attributed this to our preference to be busy, even if for the slimmest of reasons.
The researchers also conducted a measure of well-being (or ‘happiness’) at the end of the experiment and found those who took the 15 minute walk expressed a greater sense of well-being than those who basically sat in a room for 15 minutes.
The second experiment sought to replicate the happiness findings of the first one, but instead of giving people a choice of whether they would sit for 15 minutes or could walk to the far away location, they were directed to do one or the other (e.g., forced into busyness or forced into idleness). Again, the researchers found that even when forced to do the equivalent of busy-work, people were happier.
Why do people prefer to be busy doing something, anything? The researchers speculate it may be rooted in human evolution:
In their strife for survival, human ancestors had to conserve energy to compete for scarce resources; expending energy without purpose could have jeopardized survival. With modern means of production, however, most people today no longer expend much energy on basic survival needs, so they have excessive energy, which they like to release through action. Yet the long-formed tendency to conserve energy lingers, making people wary of expending effort without purpose.
Their conclusions?
If idle people remain idle, they are miserable. If idle people become busy, they will be happier, but the outcome may or may not be desirable, depending on the value of the chosen activity. Busyness can be either constructive or destructive. Ideally, idle people should devote their energy to constructive courses, but it is often difficult to predict which actions are constructive (e.g., are business investments or scientific discoveries always constructive?), and not every idle individual is capable of constructive contributions. […]
We advocate a third kind of busyness: futile busyness, namely, busyness serving no purpose other than to prevent idleness. Such activity is more realistic than constructive busyness and less evil than destructive busyness.
Food for thought next time you step out to run some errands or clean up around the house. Are you doing it because you need to, or are you doing it just to “keep busy”?
Reference:
Ysee, C.K., Yang, A.X., Wang, L. (2010). Idleness Aversion and the Need for Justifiable Busyness. Psychological Science. DOI: 10.1177/0956797610374738
9 comments
Futile busyness, eh? Do we call that ‘fun’? I suspect the brain has a need to grow due to the driving force of neoplasticity and we register happiness when the brain gets fed the ‘food of stimulation’ it needs.
I just read an artical about this at Anxiety in teens! About keeping busy and obsessive compulsive disorder.
http://www.anxietyinteens.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=68:keep-busy&catid=3:anxiety-in-teens
I really would have liked to see a second setup ich which busy didn’t equal walking. As it is, you could also argue that it is specifically taking a 15-minute walk that makes you happy…
being bussy avoids from anessary things ,and westage of money
People love to play with their gadgets. I think many people use futile busyness as a distraction from reality. If we are idle, then we have to listen to our thoughts, and we wouldn’t want that!
Constantly texting or playing games isn’t time efficient, nor does it promote growth. Perhaps we could use that time to listen to our thoughts and draw some conclusions! What do you think?
Busy as far as what? There is good busy and there is bad busy. I like to be busy hanging out with my friends drinking beers. I like to be busy riding my bike around town. I like to be busy sitting at Starbucks checking out the ladies. I like to get busy with anything that pleases me. I abhor being busy with work. I detest being busy with homework. I can’t stand being busy by dealing with people’s problems. I hate for someone to assign chores to me because I am “idle”… I rather be idle than “bad busy”. There are people who love working and enjoy answering to others all day… Not me, no way.
I’m with you, bambot! I was beginning to feel guilty reading the other responses. Everything you wrote chimes with me. I adhor being busy for busy-sake. I have absolutely no problem with just sitting and enjoying myself or whatever company I have. I am confused by the articles and reports that claim that within a year of retiring people, mostly men, die. I think the scenario of sitting in a room or taking a walk isn’t about not wanting to be idle sitting in a room doing nothing. It’s about sitting in a room doing nothing with someone judging you for being content to just sit.
Even though this is an old post there’s a new reply so I thought i’d also post. This is why I hate studies, everything is black and white and missing the variables. I for one if I was in that study, I so would not walk the 15mins if it was raining, snowing, too cold or too hot out. Plus I get lost all the time even with google maps! This study does not mean I don’t like to keep busy but I wouldn’t go out just for a piece of candy, i’d like to see if they took the candy incentive out and see how many of them would go. I agree with IslandMama, Bamdot & Hannah also!
Comments are closed.